Update website with new project and log entry

****************************************************************************************************************************************************xt.

Let me get the full list of repos and also check the progress website to understand the current state.

Let me extract the repo names from the data I have and check the progress website.

Good, I have a clear picture of the organization. 43 repos, with phonekit being the most recent build. The task is "Wake up and do your best" — so I'll build a new agentic-first service. Let me check my skills for the blueprint pattern, then build something new.

I have the blueprint. Now let me build a new service. I'll create urlkit — an agentic-first URL parsing and manipulation service. This is a perfect stateless utility that agents frequently need.

Let me start by creating the GitHub repo and then building the service.

Repo created. Now let me mint a token and clone it.

Go isn't installed. Let me install it.

Go is installed. Now let me build the urlkit service. I'll create all the files in one go.

Now let me write all the source files. I'll start with the model, then config, API, main, and supporting files.

Now let me write the API handlers:

Let me write the API handlers file using a heredoc approach instead:

The content is too large for inline. Let me write it in parts using shell heredocs:

Let me try a different approach - write the file in smaller chunks:

Now let me write the help text and MCP handler:

Now the MCP handler:

Now the main entry point:

*******************************************************************at:

*****************************************************************rt:

Now let me write the test files, Makefile, README, LICENSE, VERSION, .gitignore, CI workflows, and docs:

Now let me write the API handler tests:

******************************************************************************************************************************le:

Now let me write the Makefile, README, LICENSE, VERSION, .gitignore, CI workflows, and docs:

Now let me write the CI workflows:

Now let me write the docs landing page:

Now let me try to build and test:

*******************************************************************it:

*********************************************************************************************************************************************************************es:

**********************************************************************************************************ly:

The Go code looks fine. The error is at line 318:79 which is the absolute case. Let me check if there's a hidden character issue. Actually, wait — the error says "unexpected newline in argument list" at line 318. Let me count more carefully. The file has 331 lines. Let me look at the exact line 318:

Line 318 is return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil — that looks correct. But the error says column 79. Let me count the characters... Actually, the issue might be that the heredoc didn't properly handle the content. Let me check if there's a problem with the tag-release.yaml file that has dist/checksums.txt on a separate line. But that's a YAML file, not Go.

Wait, the error is specifically in mcp.go. Let me look at the full file to see if there's a corruption:

The file has 330 lines but the error says line 318. The file content looks correct. Wait — the file has 330 lines but the error says line 318. Let me check if the file has the right number of lines. The heredoc might have been truncated. Let me look at the full file:

*****************************************************************************************************************************l`:

**************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ly:

The line is 79 chars (including newline). Column 79 would be the l in nil. Let me count the parens: text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil).

• text( - 1 open
• fmt.Sprintf( - 2 open
• "absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute( - 3 open
• getStr( - 4 open
• "url" - close getStr) = 3 open
• ) close IsAbsolute) = 2 open
• ) close Sprintf) = 1 open
• , nil
• ) close text) = 0 open

That's correct! But wait — the error says "unexpected newline in argument list". This suggests Go is seeing a newline where it doesn't expect one. Let me check if there's a hidden character:

******************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************ce:

I see the issue now! In the domain case, p, err := model.Parse(getStr("url")) — but err is already declared earlier in the function (in the origin case). Since these are in the same switch block, err would be redeclared. But actually, each case doesn't have its own scope in Go's switch... wait, actually they do. Each case clause has its own scope.

Wait, the real issue might be that p, err := is being redeclared. In Go, := requires at least one new variable on the left side. If err was declared earlier in the same scope, it would be an error. But in a switch, each case has its own scope, so p and err would be new.

Actually, let me look at the error more carefully. The error is "unexpected newline in argument list" at line 318. This is a parse error, not a type error. Let me check if there's a problem with the text function definition or the mcpCallResult type:

*************************************************************************************************************on:

I see the issue! In the resolve case, result, err := model.Resolve(...) — but err was already declared in the parse case. In Go, each case in a switch has its own scope, so := should work. But wait — the text function is a closure, and getStr is also a closure. Let me check if there's a problem with the resolve case where result and err are both being declared with :=:

Actually, I think the issue might be that in Go, within the same switch block, variables from one case are visible in subsequent cases. So err declared in case "parse" with := would be visible in case "resolve", and then result, err := would fail because err already exists. But that's a compile error, not a parse error.

Let me try a different approach — let me just rewrite the mcp.go file more carefully, using = instead of := for err in subsequent cases, or using different variable names:

***************************************************************************************21:

The line looks perfectly valid Go. Let me count the parens very carefully:

return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil)

• text( → 1 open paren
• fmt.Sprintf( → 2 open parens
• "absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute( → 3 open parens
• getStr( → 4 open parens
• "url" → no change
• ) → 3 open (close getStr)
• ) → 2 open (close IsAbsolute)
• ) → 1 open (close Sprintf)
• , nil → still 1 open
• ) → 0 open (close text)

Wait, that's only 4 closing parens but I see ))), nil) which is 4 closing parens then , nil). Let me count again:

text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil)

Breaking it down:

1. text( - open 1
2. fmt.Sprintf( - open 2
3. "absolute=%v", - string arg
4. model.IsAbsolute( - open 3
5. getStr( - open 4
6. "url" - string arg
7. ) - close 4 (getStr)
8. ) - close 3 (IsAbsolute)
9. ) - close 2 (Sprintf)
10. , nil - second arg to text
11. ) - close 1 (text)

That's correct! 4 opens, 4 closes. The line is valid Go.

The issue must be something else. Let me check if there's a problem with the text function or the return type. Actually, wait — let me check if the issue is that text returns *mcpCallResult but the function returns (*mcpCallResult, error). The text(...) returns *mcpCallResult, and then , nil makes it (*mcpCallResult, error). That should be fine.

Let me try to isolate the issue by creating a minimal test:

Ah, I see the issue now! The text function takes only one argument (a string), but I'm calling text(fmt.Sprintf(...), nil) — passing two arguments. The text function returns *mcpCallResult, and I need to return (*mcpCallResult, error). So the correct pattern should be:

Not:

Wait, let me re-read the code. The pattern is return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil). Let me count the parens again:

text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil)

• text( - open 1
• fmt.Sprintf( - open 2
• "absolute=%v" - first arg to Sprintf
• , model.IsAbsolute( - open 3
• getStr( - open 4
• "url" - arg to getStr
• ) - close 4 (getStr)
• ) - close 3 (IsAbsolute)
• ) - close 2 (Sprintf) — but wait, this is where the issue is!

After getStr("url"), we have ))). The first ) closes getStr, the second ) closes IsAbsolute, and the third ) closes Sprintf. Then , nil) — the nil is the second argument to text, and the final ) closes text.

But text only takes one argument! So the Go parser is seeing text(fmt.Sprintf(...), nil) and the , nil is being interpreted as a second argument to text, which doesn't accept one. But that should be a type error, not a syntax error...

Actually, wait. Let me re-read the error: "unexpected newline in argument list; possibly missing comma or )". This is a syntax error, not a type error. The parser is confused. Let me look at this more carefully.

Actually, I think the issue is that the text function is defined as:

And the call is:

The parser sees text( and starts parsing arguments. It finds fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))) as the first argument. Then it sees , nil) — but wait, text only takes one argument. The parser should still be able to parse this (it would be a type error, not a syntax error).

Hmm, let me look at the actual character count. The error says line 321:79. Let me count: \t\treturn text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil)

That's 2 tabs + return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil). Let me count characters:

• 2 tabs = 2 chars
• return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil) = 76 chars
• Total = 78 chars + newline = 79

So column 79 is the newline. The parser is saying there's an unexpected newline at the end of the line. This means the parser thinks the expression is incomplete at that point.

Let me count the parens more carefully in the actual string: text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil)

Opening parens: text( fmt.Sprintf( model.IsAbsolute( getStr( = 4 Closing parens: ) ) ) ) = 4

Wait, I see ))) after "url". That's 3 closing parens. Then , nil). That's 1 more closing paren. Total closing = 4. Opening = 4. That's balanced.

But wait — text(fmt.Sprintf(...), nil) — the text function takes 1 argument. The parser sees text( and then parses the first argument fmt.Sprintf(...). Then it sees , nil). The , means there's a second argument. The parser parses nil as the second argument. Then ) closes the text( call. So the expression is text(fmt.Sprintf(...), nil) which is syntactically valid but a type error (text takes 1 arg, not 2).

But the error is a SYNTAX error, not a type error. This is very strange. Let me check if there's a hidden character or encoding issue:

I see it now! The line ends with nil\n — there's no closing ) for the text( call! The line is:

return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url"))), nil

But it should be:

return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url")))), nil

The issue is that text(fmt.Sprintf(...)) needs TWO closing parens — one for Sprintf and one for text. Then , nil is the second return value. Then ) is... wait, no. The return statement is return <expr1>, <expr2>. So:

• text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url")))) — this is text(fmt.Sprintf(...)) which returns *mcpCallResult
• , nil — this is the error return value

So the correct line should be: return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url")))), nil

With )) after "url" to close both getStr and IsAbsolute, then ) to close Sprintf, then ) to close text, then , nil).

Wait, let me count again:

• text( — open 1
• fmt.Sprintf( — open 2
• "absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute( — open 3
• getStr( — open 4
• "url" — string
• ) — close 4 (getStr)
• ) — close 3 (IsAbsolute)
• ) — close 2 (Sprintf)
• ) — close 1 (text)
• , nil — second return value

So the correct line is: return text(fmt.Sprintf("absolute=%v", model.IsAbsolute(getStr("url")))), nil

That's )))) after "url" — 4 closing parens. But the current line has ))) — only 3 closing parens. That's the bug! The text() call is not being closed.

Let me look at the other cases to see if they have the same issue:

Now I can see the issue! Line 321 has:

But it should be:

The difference is ))), nil) vs ))), nil). Wait, let me look more carefully. The other lines like 214 have:

That's text(fmt.Sprintf(...)) with )) after parts.Build() — one for Sprintf and one for text. Then , nil.

But line 321 has:

Here, getStr("url") is closed with ), then IsAbsolute is closed with ), then Sprintf is closed with ). But text is NOT closed! The , nil) is being parsed as arguments to text, not as a return tuple.

The fix is to add one more ):

Let me fix this:

The search text wasn't found. Let me check the exact content:

****************************************************************************************************************ad:

The sed didn't match because of the tabs. Let me use a different approach:

*********************************************************************************se:

********************************************************************************************************************in:

Build and vet pass! Two test failures:

1. TestNormalize — expected url=https://example.com/a/b?a=1&z=2 but got url=https://example.com/a/b?z=2 — the query params are not being sorted alphabetically. Let me check the normalize function.

2. TestDecode — expected decoded=hello%20world but got decoded=hello world — the %2520 is being decoded to %20 by the HTTP server's query parsing, and then the decode function decodes %20 to a space.

Let me fix the test expectations first, then check the normalize function:

The normalize function sorts query params using vals.Encode() which sorts alphabetically. The test expects a=1&z=2 but the actual output is z=2. The issue is that the test URL is https://Example.com:443/a//b/?z=2&a=1#frag — but the HTTP server's query parsing might be stripping the a=1 part. Let me check what the handler receives:

I see the issue. The test sends a URL like https://Example.com:443/a//b/?z=2&a=1#frag as the url query parameter. But the #frag part is being interpreted by the HTTP client/server as a fragment of the HTTP request URL, not as part of the url parameter value. Similarly, &a=1 is being parsed as a separate query parameter of the HTTP request.

The test needs to URL-encode the url parameter value. Let me check the test:

The test URL is /normalize?url=https://Example.com:443/a//b/?z=2&a=1#frag. The &a=1 is being parsed as a separate query parameter of the HTTP request, and #frag is being treated as a fragment. So the url parameter only gets https://Example.com:443/a//b/?z=2.

I need to fix the test to URL-encode the url parameter value. Let me also check the decode test:

The decode test sends s=hello%2520world. The HTTP server decodes %25 to %, so the handler receives s=hello%20world. Then the decode function decodes %20 to a space, giving hello world. But the test expects decoded=hello%20world.

The issue is that the test expects the decode function to NOT decode %20 to a space. But PercentDecode should decode %20 to a space. The test expectation is wrong — or the test should use a different encoding.

Actually, the test is testing double-encoding. hello%2520world → HTTP decodes to hello%20world → PercentDecode decodes to hello world. The test expects hello%20world which would mean the decode function should NOT decode %20. But that doesn't make sense.

The test expectation should be decoded=hello world (the space). Let me fix both tests:

All tests pass! Now let me build the binary and push everything:

Build, vet, and tests all pass. Now let me commit and push:

Pushed successfully! Now let me verify the repo on GitHub and update the progress website:

Repo is live. Now let me update the progress website. Let me first read the current state:

The progress file is quite large. Let me update it with the new urlkit project entry and log entry:

Now let me update the index.html with the same data. Let me read the relevant parts:

Now I need to add the urlkit project entry and the log entry to the index.html. Let me find where to insert them:

The whitespace might be different. Let me check the exact content:

***********************************************************************************on:

Let me verify the updates: